Stock Screener by Patterns
Chart patterns are not database fields. No column in a market data feed evaluates to true for a rounded base or a contraction sequence. Any tool advertising automatic detection has quietly fixed the parameters on your behalf: how deep a correction may run, how long a consolidation should last, what counts as sufficient turnover. Those settings are the substance of the method, and they belong to the trader.
A stock screener for chart patterns does something narrower and more useful: it converts each formation’s countable attributes into filter conditions, reduces a universe of several thousand tickers to a reviewable shortlist, and leaves the visual verdict where it belongs.
Deepvue’s screening engine supplies 1,152 fields for that translation work, arrives with over 150 ready made screens including eighty carrying a professional trader’s name, and refreshes 568 values continuously through the session. Results appear alongside charts, watchlists, an alerts panel and a terminal that reads plain sentences, all on one screen.
Use the Stock Screener by Patterns You Trade
Each formation below has a dedicated page explaining the structure, the market behaviour that produces it, and how to approximate it with filter criteria.
Why Screen by Pattern at All?
Anyone trading from chart structure runs into an arithmetic obstacle before an analytical one. Several thousand tickers merit consideration, a real formation needs months to assemble, and the moment worth acting on generally precedes completion rather than following it. No one reviews that many charts by hand at any useful cadence.
Filtering addresses quantity, not discernment. A sound screen discards the overwhelming majority that could not qualify under any reading, leaving something short enough to work through carefully. That working through remains unavoidable.
It is also why automated detection tends to frustrate people with experience. The very settings that distinguish a workable base from one that merely resembles it are the settings such tools freeze. Someone who has watched these formations develop for three years holds specific views on how deep a secondary consolidation may run, and no factory default will coincide with them.
What Makes a Stock Screener for Chart Patterns Work
Four elements recur across every structure in this cluster.
Context Before Structure
Most formations worth owning are continuations, so they signify nothing in a stock with no advance behind it. Filter on outline alone and you retrieve a crowd of dormant, broken tickers that happen to trace the correct silhouette. Strength criteria therefore come first, whether measured by relative strength, standing versus the major averages, or proximity to the annual peak. The double bottom is the deliberate exception, since it overturns a trend instead of extending one, and its criteria have to be relaxed on purpose.
Volume as the Deciding Variable
Turnover settles every formation here. Contraction sequences require it tapering across the base. Handles require it fading ahead of the pivot. Twin lows require it thinning on the second and surging at the trigger. Overnight jumps require it confirming the new price. Criteria that specify outline while ignoring participation will hand back structures that photograph well and trade badly, and that is the most frequent way this whole exercise goes wrong.
Relative Measures Rather Than Absolute Ones
A three percent move is dramatic for a regulated utility and trivial for a company listed eighteen months ago. Twenty percent off the high barely registers for one name and represents real damage for another. Criteria benchmarked to each stock’s own record, turnover set against its typical turnover, a jump set against its typical daily range, a span set against its recent spans, return results that can be compared across a universe where flat percentages cannot.
Fundamentals Where the Method Calls for Them
Plenty of technical traders ignore the income statement entirely, but the growth stock lineage these formations descend from never did. A textbook base in a company whose revenue growth is slowing is a picture with no thesis attached. The library holds 227 earnings measures, a further 159 on fundamentals and 126 addressing sales, every one usable as a criterion, which lets the commercial argument and the chart argument be assembled together.
How Deepvue Handles Chart Pattern Screening
The field library is organised along lines that match the task. Technicals account for 276 of them. Price and volume derivatives contribute 145. Earnings supply 227, fundamentals 159 and sales 126. Institutional and insider holdings add 84, Deepvue’s own composite ratings another 56, and extended hours activity a final 24.
Condition groups get names and are joined by ANY or ALL operators, which is how one screen can specify two stages of a formation at different levels of strictness. No formula language appears anywhere. Completed sets are saved, foldered, and will accept a preset laid across them.
Anyone who would sooner describe a setup than assemble one can type it as a sentence and let the terminal do the construction, as often as they like. And since this style of trading consists largely of waiting, output moves straight into watchlists and alerts without a change of tab.
Pricing
There is a single Deepvue subscription and it costs $49 each month. Every field, every preset, the condition builder, unmetered terminal use, charting, watchlists and alerting are all inside it, with no premium tier above.
The equivalent MarketSurge product is priced at $149 each month.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a stock screener find chart patterns?
Not in the literal sense, and tools advertising it are simply applying definitions somebody else chose. Shapes are not stored anywhere in market data. A stock screener by patterns instead renders each formation’s countable attributes as criteria, covering depth, duration, turnover behaviour and location within a range, then returns a shortlist. Recognition happens afterwards, when you look at what came back.
What is the best stock screener for chart patterns?
A better question is which platform surfaces the criteria a particular formation genuinely rests on. In practice that means turnover judged against each individual ticker, volatility figures scaled to its own record, extended hours coverage for anything involving gaps, and income statement fields if you trade in the growth stock tradition. Ready made screens from specialists make a sensible foundation, so long as the software treats them as editable rather than sealed.
Which chart patterns work best for growth stock traders?
Formations from the CANSLIM and momentum lineages carry most of the weight: rounded bases with handles, contraction sequences, flat bases, twin lows, and entries taken off post earnings jumps. Their common feature is that each marks a pause inside an advance already underway, which fits a holding period counted in weeks and months. Setups built around intraday reversals come from a different discipline entirely.
How reliable are chart patterns?
Considerably less so than the people selling courses about them imply, and what governs the outcome is surroundings rather than silhouette. An identical formation resolves one way while the index is climbing and another while it is sliding, and differently again in a market leader versus something second rate. Setups demanding a defined trigger before entry hold up better than ones bought in anticipation, largely because the trigger discards a portion of the failures before any capital is at risk. None of them makes a stop loss optional.
How often should I run a pattern screen?
Every session for gap driven setups, which exist on one specific morning and not the next. Once a week generally covers base formations, since they build over months and seldom transform between two closes. A common rhythm is a broad structural scan each weekend to refresh the candidate pool, followed by daily monitoring of those specific names through a watchlist, with alerts placed at the levels that matter, instead of rescanning everything.
Do I still need to look at the charts?
Yes. Everything on these pages generates candidates, not verdicts. Whether a correction curves properly, whether the secondary consolidation sits high enough within it, whether two troughs are truly comparable, whether an overnight jump cleared anything structurally significant, all of that is read more accurately by a person than by a condition. Filtering exists to make the reading feasible in the first place, by reducing the field to something a human can actually get through.